On which ONE of the following occasions may the courts refer to Hansard as an extrinsic aid to interpretation?
A) Always. The words in debate are equally as valid as those in the Act itself.
B) When the legislation is ambiguous or obscure, but there are clear comments from Members of Parliament (MPs) in Hansard.
C) When the wording of the legislation leads to absurdity, but Hansard contains clear comments from the Minister promoting the Bill.
D) Never. The courts may only use the actual words of the Act as enacted by Parliament.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following presumptions are valid
Q3: Which of the following cases is an
Q4: Which rule of language means that words
Q5: Which ONE of the following rules of
Q6: The _ approach requires consideration of the
Q7: 'Section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act
Q8: 'Section 2(4) of the European Communities Act
Q9: 'Headings and marginal notes are not part
Q10: Punctuation is an example of an _
Q11: Which of the following are intrinsic aids
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents