In response to the Supreme Court decision in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), President Andrew Jackson famously said, "Mr. Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it." Discuss what that statement means in the context of the power the Supreme Court has to enforce its decisions. What political forces allowed Jackson to ignore a Supreme Court decision? Could President Obama do the same thing today?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The statement made by President Andrew Jackson in response to the Supreme Court decision in Worcester v. Georgia reflects his defiance of the Court's authority. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Georgia did not have the right to impose its laws on Cherokee territory, but Jackson refused to enforce the decision.

This statement highlights the limitations of the Supreme Court's power to enforce its decisions. While the Court can interpret the Constitution and laws, it relies on the executive branch, particularly the President, to enforce its rulings. In this case, Jackson's refusal to enforce the Court's decision demonstrated the potential for political forces to undermine the authority of the judiciary.

The political forces that allowed Jackson to ignore the Supreme Court decision were rooted in his belief in states' rights and his support for the removal of Native American tribes from their lands. Jackson's actions were also influenced by his strong executive authority and his belief in the supremacy of the presidency.

In today's political climate, it would be highly unlikely for a President to openly defy a Supreme Court decision in the same manner as Jackson did. The system of checks and balances, as well as the rule of law, have become more firmly established in American governance. While Presidents may disagree with Supreme Court decisions, they are generally expected to uphold and enforce them. However, it is important to note that the potential for political forces to influence the enforcement of Supreme Court decisions still exists, and the issue of compliance with judicial rulings remains a topic of debate and concern in contemporary politics.

In Response to the Supreme Court Decision in Worcester V