Question 1

The Following Questions For Readings: "Is It Ever OK to Lie to Patients?" Shelly K. Schwartz
-Schwartz says that most studies over the last decade found that patients who were told candidly they are going to die

Accepted Answer

Studies have shown that patients who were candidly informed about their terminal prognosis lived as long as those who were not told, indicating that the knowledge of their impending death did not shorten their lifespan.

Question 2

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels
-Rachels says there is a close connection between our ability to control who has access to us and information about us and our

Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that controlling access to ourselves and information about us is crucial for creating and maintaining varied social relationships, as it allows us to present different aspects of ourselves in different contexts.

Question 3

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels
-Rachels argues that privacy is necessary if we are to

Accepted Answer

Rachels emphasizes the importance of privacy in maintaining the variety of social relationships we desire, as it allows us to control how we present ourselves in different contexts and to different people.

Question 4

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels
-Rachels says that if we are to maintain a system of different relationships with different people, we need to

Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that privacy is crucial for maintaining distinct relationships with different people, which requires the ability to separate our associations. This separation allows us to manage the different roles and interactions we have with various individuals in our lives.

Question 5

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler
-Siegler says we should establish the distinction between information about the patient that generally will be kept confidential regardless of the interests of third parties and information that

Accepted Answer

Siegler emphasizes the importance of sharing patient information among the healthcare team to provide care, distinguishing it from information that is kept strictly confidential. This approach supports effective patient care while respecting privacy.

Question 6

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler
-According to Siegler, confidentiality is important because it shows respect for the patient's individuality and privacy and nurtures

Accepted Answer

Siegler emphasizes the importance of confidentiality in building and maintaining the trust between a patient and their doctor, which is crucial for effective medical care.

Question 7

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler
-Siegler argues that in this era of high-tech health care, the traditional ideal of patient-physician confidentiality

Accepted Answer

The answer of The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in...

Question 8

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California
-In the Tarasoff case, the court ruled that when a patient poses a serious threat to others, the professional duties of confidentiality can be

Accepted Answer

The court ruled that the duty to protect individuals who may be harmed by a patient overrides the professional duty of confidentiality when a patient poses a serious threat to others.

Question 9

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California
-In the Tarasoff case, the court said that the risk that unnecessary warnings may be given is

Accepted Answer

The court in the Tarasoff case determined that the risk of unnecessary warnings is a reasonable price to pay to protect the lives of potential victims, emphasizing the duty to warn individuals who may be in danger.

Question 10

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California
-In the Tarasoff case, the court ruled that some considerations

Accepted Answer

The Tarasoff case established that mental health professionals have a duty to warn individuals who are threatened with bodily harm by a patient, indicating that certain considerations can indeed establish a duty to warn.

Quiz 4: Truth-Telling and Confidentiality

The Following Questions For Readings: "Is It Ever OK to Lie to Patients?" Shelly K. Schwartz -Schwartz says that most studies over the last decade found that patients who were told candidly they are going to die

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels -Rachels says there is a close connection between our ability to control who has access to us and information about us and our

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels -Rachels argues that privacy is necessary if we are to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Privacy Is Important," James Rachels -Rachels says that if we are to maintain a system of different relationships with different people, we need to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler -Siegler says we should establish the distinction between information about the patient that generally will be kept confidential regardless of the interests of third parties and information that

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler -According to Siegler, confidentiality is important because it shows respect for the patient's individuality and privacy and nurtures

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confidentiality in Medicine-A Decrepit Concept," Mark Siegler -Siegler argues that in this era of high-tech health care, the traditional ideal of patient-physician confidentiality

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California -In the Tarasoff case, the court ruled that when a patient poses a serious threat to others, the professional duties of confidentiality can be

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California -In the Tarasoff case, the court said that the risk that unnecessary warnings may be given is

The Following Questions For Readings: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of California -In the Tarasoff case, the court ruled that some considerations