Question 1

The Following Questions For Readings: "The Refutation of Medical Paternalism," Alan Goldman
-Goldman says that health and prolonged life

Accepted Answer

Goldman argues against medical paternalism by emphasizing that health and prolonged life cannot be assumed to be the top priorities for all patients, as individuals may have different values and preferences.

Question 2

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman
-According to Ackerman, true respect for autonomy may require the physician to

Accepted Answer

Ackerman argues that true respect for a patient's autonomy sometimes necessitates intervention by the physician, especially if it is in the best interest of the patient's health and well-being. This perspective acknowledges that respecting autonomy is not just about adhering strictly to a patient's current preferences, but also involves ensuring that patients are making informed decisions and are not harmed due to their choices.

Question 3

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman
-Ackerman says that autonomy can be compromised by

Accepted Answer

Illness can compromise a patient's autonomy by affecting their ability to make informed decisions about their own healthcare.

Question 4

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman
-Ackerman argues that the non-interference approach fails to genuinely respect autonomy because

Accepted Answer

Ackerman argues that the non-interference approach does not genuinely respect autonomy because it overlooks the complexity of autonomy, failing to acknowledge that various factors can compromise a person's autonomy, not just a single issue.

Question 5

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz
-Schwartz says that in the Wanglie case, the central question was not whether the treatment requested by the patient was futile, but whether the treatment was

Accepted Answer

In the Wanglie case, as discussed by Robert L. Schwartz, the central question revolved around whether the treatment requested by the patient was beyond the proper limits of medicine, rather than its futility. This distinction is crucial in understanding the ethical considerations in medical treatment decisions.

Question 6

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz
-Schwartz says that physicians are not required by the principle of autonomy to

Accepted Answer

Schwartz argues that the principle of autonomy does not obligate physicians to provide treatments that are scientifically futile, meaning treatments that would not achieve their intended health outcomes.

Question 7

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz
-Schwartz says that defining the scope of medicine should be left to

Accepted Answer

Schwartz argues that defining the scope of medicine should primarily be the responsibility of physicians, as they possess the expertise and understanding necessary to determine what medical interventions are appropriate and beneficial.

Question 8

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel
-Which physician-patient relationship model aims to help the patient determine and choose the best health-related values that can be realized in the clinical situation?

Accepted Answer

The deliberative model aims to help the patient determine and choose the best health-related values that can be realized in the clinical situation by engaging in a dialogue where the physician helps the patient understand the values at stake and suggests why certain health-related values are more worthy and should be aspired to.

Question 9

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel
-According to the Emanuels,

Accepted Answer

The Emanuels argue that the paternalistic model, where the physician makes decisions for the patient, is rarely advocated as an ideal in modern medicine due to the emphasis on patient autonomy and shared decision-making.

Question 10

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel
-According to the Emanuels, the dominant model in bioethics has been the _______ model.

Accepted Answer

The Emanuels identify the informative model as the dominant model in bioethics, which emphasizes providing the patient with information and allowing them to make their own decisions.

Question 11

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt
-Dax Cowart refused to consent to the treatments for his injuries because

Accepted Answer

Dax Cowart refused treatments because they were excruciatingly painful, and he believed in his right to refuse treatment despite the pain and potential consequences.

Question 12

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt
-Robert Burt thinks it important that anyone hearing a request to die from someone like Dax Cowart should

Accepted Answer

Robert Burt advocates for engaging in a dialogue with the patient, exploring and even arguing about their request to die, rather than simply accepting it at face value or dismissing it. This approach emphasizes understanding the patient's perspective and reasoning.

Question 13

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt
-Dax Cowart insists that no one has the right to

Accepted Answer

Dax Cowart argues for the principle of autonomy, insisting that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment, emphasizing that forced medical treatment without consent violates this principle.

Question 14

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals
-The Bouvia ruling asserted that a competent patient

Accepted Answer

The Bouvia ruling is significant for establishing that a competent patient has the right to refuse medical treatments, even those necessary to preserve life, emphasizing the importance of bodily autonomy and the right to make decisions about one's own health care.

Question 15

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals
-The court ruled that preferring a natural death to a drugged life attached to a mechanical device is

Accepted Answer

The court in Bouvia v. Superior Court recognized the right of an individual to refuse medical treatment, indicating that preferring a natural death over a life sustained by medical intervention is not illegal or immoral. This decision respects personal autonomy and the right to make decisions about one's own body and medical care.

Question 16

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals
-The Bouvia ruling asserted that competent adults have a "constitutionally guaranteed right" to

Accepted Answer

The Bouvia ruling is significant for establishing that competent adults have the right to make decisions about their own medical treatment, including the right to refuse it. This case emphasized the importance of personal autonomy and self-determination in medical decision-making.

Question 17

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs
-The AMA's medical code of ethics says that physicians should serve as

Accepted Answer

The AMA's medical code of ethics emphasizes that physicians should act as their patients' advocates, meaning they should support and promote the interests of their patients. This role involves ensuring that patients receive appropriate care and respect for their wishes and needs, rather than acting as legal guardians, making moral decisions for them, or focusing primarily on protecting their own professional rights.

Question 18

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs
-The AMA's medical code says that physicians should respect their patients' right to

Accepted Answer

The AMA's medical code emphasizes the importance of informed consent, which includes providing patients with complete information about treatments and their alternatives.

Question 19

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs
-The AMA's code asserts that patients are entitled to

Accepted Answer

Patients are entitled to receive independent professional opinions according to the AMA's code, which emphasizes the importance of autonomy and informed decision-making in the patient-physician relationship.

Question 20

The Following Questions For Readings: "Advocacy or Subservience for the Sake of Patients?," Helga Kuhse
-Kuhse argues that requiring nurses to be subservient to physicians would probably

Accepted Answer

Kuhse argues that requiring nurses to be subservient to physicians could harm patients because it undermines the nurses' ability to advocate for their patients' best interests, potentially compromising patient care.

Quiz 3: Paternalism and Patient Autonomy

The Following Questions For Readings: "The Refutation of Medical Paternalism," Alan Goldman -Goldman says that health and prolonged life

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman -According to Ackerman, true respect for autonomy may require the physician to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman -Ackerman says that autonomy can be compromised by

The Following Questions For Readings: "Why Doctors Should Intervene," Terrence F. Ackerman -Ackerman argues that the non-interference approach fails to genuinely respect autonomy because

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz -Schwartz says that in the Wanglie case, the central question was not whether the treatment requested by the patient was futile, but whether the treatment was

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz -Schwartz says that physicians are not required by the principle of autonomy to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine," Robert L. Schwartz -Schwartz says that defining the scope of medicine should be left to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel -Which physician-patient relationship model aims to help the patient determine and choose the best health-related values that can be realized in the clinical situation?

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel -According to the Emanuels,

The Following Questions For Readings: "Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship," Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel -According to the Emanuels, the dominant model in bioethics has been the _______ model.

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt -Dax Cowart refused to consent to the treatments for his injuries because

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt -Robert Burt thinks it important that anyone hearing a request to die from someone like Dax Cowart should

The Following Questions For Readings: "Confronting Death," Dax Cowart and Robert Burt -Dax Cowart insists that no one has the right to

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals -The Bouvia ruling asserted that a competent patient

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals -The court ruled that preferring a natural death to a drugged life attached to a mechanical device is

The Following Questions For Readings: Bouvia v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeals -The Bouvia ruling asserted that competent adults have a "constitutionally guaranteed right" to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs -The AMA's medical code of ethics says that physicians should serve as

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs -The AMA's medical code says that physicians should respect their patients' right to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship," AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs -The AMA's code asserts that patients are entitled to

The Following Questions For Readings: "Advocacy or Subservience for the Sake of Patients?," Helga Kuhse -Kuhse argues that requiring nurses to be subservient to physicians would probably