Thomas E. Hill's goal is to show that there are plausible deontological principles that require one to protest injustice, even when doing so achieves little to nothing. Briefly explain Hill's view. Next, explain why someone might think that you shouldn't protest in such cases-or, at least, that you aren't obligated to protest in those cases. Which position do you find most compelling? Why?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Demonstrate understanding of Hill's position and his argument for it.
-Develop a thoughtful alternative to Hill's position.
-Develop a plausible stance on the two positions, correctly identifying and defending controversial claims using sound reasoning, helpful analogies, appeals to plausible principles, etc.

Thomas E Hill's Goal Is to Show That There Are Plausible