Alastair Norcross points out that while most Americans are opposed to eating dogs, people in some other countries are not. Ultimately, he concludes that it doesn't matter what people think about dogs-it just matters whether dogs would suffer if abused. Explain how Norcross gets from his observation about cultural differences to the conclusion that cultural difference doesn't matter because what matters is what dogs are like. Then, assess this argument. Is it a good argument? Why or why not?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Correctly explain Norcross's argument regarding cultural difference and its moral irrelevance.
-Develop a thoughtful position on Norcross's argument, correctly identifying and defending controversial claims using sound reasoning, well-chosen examples, insightful analogies, etc.

Alastair Norcross Points Out That While Most Americans Are Opposed