What is Norcross's response to the idea that the morally relevant difference between us and Fred is that Fred tortures the puppies himself, whereas most Americans consume meat that comes from animals that have been tortured by others.
A) We commonly accept that even small risks of great harms are unacceptable
B) Farm animals are deserving of more moral concern than puppies
C) Whatever good could plausibly be claimed to come out of the system clearly doesn't outweigh the bad
D) We wouldn't have thought any better of Fred if he had been squeamish and had employed someone else to torture the puppies
E) The torture of farm animals is in fact much worse than Fred's treatment of the puppies he tortures
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: How good is the analogy between what
Q2: Explain Alastair Norcross's two responses to the
Q3: Alastair Norcross points out that while most
Q4: What was Norcross's purpose in telling the
Q6: Norcross states that the common response of
Q7: What does the doctrine of double effect
Q8: What is something that, according to Norcross,
Q9: Giving up factory-raised chicken has only a
Q10: What is the point of the "Chocolate
Q11: The story about Fred involves the cocoamone
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents