Marion Hourdequin says, "consequentialist reasoning in the arguments for a political, but not personal, obligation with respect to climate change does not take adequate account of human psychology." First, explain Hourdequin's point here. Then, discuss how a consequentialist could reply to Hourdequin's challenge. Finally, imagine how Hourdequin might defend her point against the consequentialist's reply.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Accurately explain Hourdequin's point in the quoted passage.
-Demonstrate understanding of consequentialism and the ability to apply that theory to the present issue.
-Develop a plausible reply on Hourdequin's behalf, demonstrating the ability to extend her views to this issue.

Marion Hourdequin Says, "Consequentialist Reasoning in the Arguments for a Political