Many philosophers have objected to consequentialism for being too demanding-it just asks too much of us. However, if Marion Hourdequin is right, then virtue ethics asks even more of us. Not only do we have to do the things that consequentialists say we have to do, but then we're supposed to have integrity as well, which places even more obligations on us! In the first part of your paper, try to formulate the demandingness objection to virtue ethics as best you can. Then, in the second part of your paper, try to defend virtue ethics against that challenge.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Summarize Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's case against the wrongness
Q2: Marion Hourdequin says, "consequentialist reasoning in the
Q4: Which virtue does Hourdequin use as a
Q5: What are the two aspects of integrity?
A)
Q6: According to Hourdequin, although it might be
Q7: According to Hourdequin, consequentialists sometimes fail to
Q8: Hourdequin argues that Sinnott-Armstrong is wrong to
Q9: What does Hourdequin contrast integrity with?
A) Hypocrisy
B)
Q10: According to Hourdequin, what's the intrapersonal value
Q11: According to Hourdequin, what's the interpersonal value
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents