Jack throws a stone towards a dense crowd of people intending to strike Ted but aware that he might strike another person. Unfortunately, the stone strikes Habib. Which of the following statements is not a valid reason for convicting Jack of battery in respect of Habib?
A) Because Jack failed to foresee a risk that a reasonable person would have foreseen
B) Because the actus reus and mens rea coincide
C) Due to the application of the doctrine of transferred malice
D) Because Jack is reckless as to whether he inflicts force on Habib
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following is the most
Q2: Which of the following currently a leading
Q3: Carl plants a bomb in a public
Q4: Which of the following is currently the
Q5: Which of the following statements is a
Q6: Which of the following statements about negligence
Q7: In which of the following authorities was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents