In "Bystander's Three Options," Thomson argues that the bystander may not permissibly kill one worker to save five because:
A) he is obligated to let nature run its course.
B) all lives are equally valuable and cannot be weighed against one another.
C) he must not kill another to save lives if he can do so by killing himself instead.
D) killing is unconditionally wrong.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A "ceteris paribus" principle is of what
Q2: In the "Bystander's Three Options" case, Thomson
Q3: In the "Bystander's Three Options" case, Thomson
Q5: In the "Bystander's Three Options" case, option
Q6: In "Bystander's Three Options," Thomson believes that
Q7: If you want to save the five
Q8: The "Bystander's Three Options" case is intended
Q9: Thomson would likely agree most that to
Q10: In the original trolley paper (chapter 54),
Q11: In this paper, Thomson changes the point
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents