Through their replies, it is clear that John Corvino disagrees with Ryan Anderson and Sherif Girgis on what must be involved in a discriminatory act for it to be harmful. In your essay, explain the nature of these authors' disagreement, drawing from both of their works. Then, offer an explanation of what type of discriminatory act is involved in a case like Bowman-Cryer's (that Corvino discusses in his essay). Do you think Corvino's or Anderson and Girgis' description of harm best fits this case? Why?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Provide textual support for the authors' claims on what must be involved for a discriminatory act to be harmful, drawing from the replies
Argue that a case like Bowman-Cryer's is best described by Corvino's description of harm. Or,
Argue that a case like Bowman-Cryer's is best described by Anderson and Girgis' description of discriminatory acts that ought not be the target of antidiscrimination laws

Through Their Replies, It Is Clear That John Corvino Disagrees