Barry participated in a lineup at a stage in the criminal process where his right to counsel would have attached. However, at the time, Barry was not afforded legal representation nor did he waive his right to have one present at the lineup. The prosecutor intends to use the outcome of the lineup-which resulted in the victim identifying Barry as the perpetrator-at trial. Barry's attorney objects to the introduction of the lineup results. How will the court rule?
A) For the prosecution since the burden was on Barry to ensure that his rights were protected
B) For the prosecution, provided the prosecution can have the witness confirm the identification while on the witness stand
C) For the defendant, since the lineup violated Barry's constitutional right to counsel
D) For the defendant, as Barry's objection to the introduction of the lineup at trial served as his invocation of his constitutional right to an attorney
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: A "victim factor" that impacts a victim's
Q10: "Offender factors" that explain misidentification include:
A) People
Q11: Which of the following impact a person's
Q12: Which of the following represents a threat
Q13: Under the Wade-Gilbert rule, a suspect has
Q15: Barry participated at a lineup at a
Q16: In Wade, the Court pointed to numerous
Q17: Which of the following factors that the
Q18: In Kirby v. Illinois the Court held
Q19: The reason offered by the U.S. Supreme
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents