Addressed by the Court in Hiibel, the stop-and-identify statutes:
A) Required individuals to present identification during a reasonable suspicion stop
B) Authorized police officers to make random stops of individuals to obtain identification as part of police efforts to arrest persons with outstanding warrants
C) Authorized police officers to check a person's identity near U.S. borders to help enforce U.S. immigration laws
D) Required police officers to detain a person who does not have identification on his or her person until such time as the person' identity can be established
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following represents a true
Q23: What is the inquiry made by the
Q24: In State v. Munson, late at night
Q25: In United States v. Gallegos, the police
Q26: In United States v. Lopez-Arias, four officers,
Q28: The Court's position on requiring a person
Q29: A stop-and-identify statute:
A) Requires an individual to
Q30: What is the U.S. Supreme Court's position
Q31: Under Terry, what are the guideline set
Q32: The test for the constitutionality of a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents