What is the U.S. Supreme Court's position on a police officer requiring the driver and the passengers of a vehicle to get out of the vehicle during a Terry stop?
A) Such acts are never permissible because the acts exceed the level of intrusion into a person's liberty that is permissible under Terry.
B) Such acts are permissible because the concerns for officer safety outweigh the di minimis intrusion of the liberty of the vehicle's occupants.
C) Removing a passenger from a vehicle is permissible only when the officer reasonable believes that the passenger poses a threat.
D) Removing a passenger from a vehicle is permissible only when the police officer has reasonable suspicion to order the passenger out of the vehicle.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: In United States v. Gallegos, the police
Q26: In United States v. Lopez-Arias, four officers,
Q27: Addressed by the Court in Hiibel, the
Q28: The Court's position on requiring a person
Q29: A stop-and-identify statute:
A) Requires an individual to
Q31: Under Terry, what are the guideline set
Q32: The test for the constitutionality of a
Q33: Factors considered in determining whether the suspect
Q34: In Michigan v. Long, the Court:
A) Extended
Q35: The U.S. Supreme Court used the following
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents