Which of the following statements represents the common law approach to prior inconsistent statements?
A) Prior inconsistent statements were hearsay if introduced for the truth of the matter asserted.
B) Prior inconsistent statements were admissible as long as the declarant was available to testify at trial.
C) Prior inconsistent statements were admissible as long as the jury had an opportunity to observe the witness and his or her responses to questioning about the prior inconsistent statements.
D) Prior inconsistent statements were inadmissible if the declarant objected to their admission at trial.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: All courts apply the adoptive admission exception
Q19: Chris, CEO of XAM Corporation, denies that
Q20: Carson, an employee truck driver for the
Q21: A statement made by a co-conspirator against
Q22: Prior statements by a witness that are
Q24: Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, prior
Q25: Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, a
Q26: Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, a
Q27: A statement describing or explaining an event
Q28: Which of the following represents a true
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents