Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements Are

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, prior inconsistent statements are admissible:

A) When the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination about the hearing
B) When the statement is inconsistent with the witness's current testimony
C) When the inconsistent statement was given under oath or penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, other proceeding or deposition
D) When the witness is given an opportunity to admit, explain the inconsistency, or deny making the statement.
E) All of the above must occur in order for the inconsistent statement to be admissible.