What did a 2017 study observe from its review of research misconduct cases that were reported to federal agencies by the scientific community?
A) The volume of research misconduct detected and reported was higher than the researchers expected to find.
B) The scientific community was concerned that detecting too much research misconduct would call the veracity of their overall research into question.
C) The scientific community was not capable of finding and responding to research misconduct.
D) Scientific research would be improved by finding and responding to research misconduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following was one reason
Q3: Why might it be more difficult to
Q4: When is plagiarism most often discovered?
A) Reviewers
Q5: What consequence might research misconduct have for
Q6: What is a pattern that distinguishes research
Q7: In the study noted in the reading,
Q8: Which of the following is not an
Q9: Accusations of research misconduct generally begin from
Q10: Ghost writing occurs under which of these
Q11: What percent of articles in the Journal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents