What is Henry Shue's main point in his argument about the ticking time bomb in Paris?
A) When someone has done or is about to do something seriously morally wrong, it is permissible to torture that person to prevent or correct the wrong that he or she has committed.
B) The case of the ticking time bomb shows that, ultimately, only the consequences of one's actions matter, even if those actions strike many people as wrong or would be wrong in most circumstances.
C) There are conceivable but unrealistic circumstances in which the consequences of torturing someone are so much better than the consequences of not torturing that person that it would be permissible to torture the person.
D) Although torture is generally wrong because it violates serious deontological constraints, it is nonetheless permissible when the consequences of torturing someone are better than the consequences of not torturing that person.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Why, in constructing his TICKING TIME BOMB
Q3: Which premise in Henry Shue's TICKING TIME
Q4: What is a state of affairs, as
Q5: When someone says that one state of
Q6: Which of the following best captures the
Q7: What is a deontological constraint?
A) A duty
Q8: Which of the following arguments involves a
Q9: Which of the following arguments does NOT
Q10: Which of the following is NOT identified
Q11: Which of the following does Chapter 4
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents