Why, according to Metz, are African consequentialist arguments against the death penalty unpersuasive?
A) They rely on inconclusive evidence about the penalty's deterrent value.
B) They implausibly value communal relations above individual autonomy.
C) They wrongly imply that the value of human life is only a conditional value.
D) They focus too strongly on comparatively rare miscarriages of justice.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Metz argues that African consequentialist arguments against the death penalty are unpersuasive because they rely on inconclusive evidence about the penalty's deterrent value, making it difficult to definitively argue against its effectiveness.

Why, According to Metz, Are African Consequentialist Arguments Against the Death