Which of the following would be an objection to Metz's argument for the conclusion that the lives of humans are inherently more valuable than the lives of animals?
A) The lives of humans are inherently more valuable than the lives of animals because only human beings have inherent dignity.
B) The lives of human beings are inherently more valuable than the lives of animals because animals lack legitimate autonomy.
C) The lives of humans are inherently more valuable than the lives of animals because human beings are a spiritual offshoot of God.
D) The lives of humans are not inherently more valuable than the lives of animals because many animals are also capable of loving, communal relationships.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Option D is an objection to Metz's argument because it challenges the premise that human lives are inherently more valuable by pointing out a valuable trait (capability for loving, communal relationships) that many animals also possess.

Which of the Following Would Be an Objection to Metz's