In the case described by Beauchamp and Childress of a ninety-year-old patient with a squamous cell carcinoma who was extremely fearful of cancer, which of the following was NOT set forth as a justification for "intentional verbal inaccuracy" on the part of the physician who treated the patient?
A) The patient was in need of "effective reassurance."
B) The patient's family urged the physician not to tell him that the ulcer on his lip was cancer, because of the patient's fearfulness of the disease.
C) In the physician's judgment, it was "more truthful" to tell the patient he did not have cancer, because the patient was unable to accept the idea that he had a treatable and curable cancer.
D) Addressing the patient and his concerns in his own language expressed respect, not paternalistic arrogance.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The four rules of professional-patient relationships set
Q2: How, according to Beauchamp and Childress, have
Q3: What is Beauchamp and Childress's understanding of
Q4: What is the moral status of the
Q6: Beauchamp and Childress argue that the following
Q7: Beauchamp and Childress make the following argument
Q8: Which of the following is true about
Q9: Besides informational, physical, decisional, and proprietary privacy,
Q10: Beauchamp and Childress believe that the following
Q11: Beauchamp and Childress state that the following
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents