In the struggle to ratify the Constitution, how did the Federalists defend their argument that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Federalists defended their argument that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary by using the "reserved powers theory," which asserted that powers not expressly granted to the national government by the federal Constitution would be retained by the people and the states. This argument suggested that the federal government would only have power over issues specifically enumerated in the Constitution, leaving all other powers to the states and the people. By emphasizing this idea, Federalists argued that there was no need for a Bill of Rights to further protect individual liberties.

In the Struggle to Ratify the Constitution, How Did the Federalists