Currently, some countries do not require IRB approval before you can conduct research with human participants, nor do these countries have any sort of review entities that are equivalent to an Institutional Review Board. At a recent conference, a fellow researcher suggested you consider conducting research in one such country (i.e., Methodia [a fictional country used for the sake of argument]), to avoid the overly burdensome and excessive red tape of your institution's IRB. Technically, this would not violate federal guidelines for participant protections if you did not represent yourself as a member of your home institution - so you decide to do it. What are the ethical implications of such a practice? Is what you are doing ethical - why or why not? How might this impact the process and integrity of conducting research in the US and at your home institution, both for yourself and for other researchers?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q11: Besides the blatantly obvious examples of ethical
Q12: The Association of Psychological Science (APS) has
Q13: Why is outside funding (e.g., from a
Q14: Why have some scientists argued that racial
Q15: What is informed consent, and why is
Q16: What are some solutions to the ethical
Q17: Were the "obedience studies" of Stanley Milgram
Q18: Discuss the practice of "debriefing" human participants.
Q19: You conducted a study that investigated whether
Q20: You conducted a longitudinal study of teenagers'
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents