Listening juries are more likely to engage in substantive conflict than affective conflict.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Listening juries are more likely to engage in substantive conflict, which involves disagreements on facts, evidence, and legal interpretation, rather than affective conflict, which involves personal feelings and emotions. This is because listening juries tend to focus on the evidence and arguments presented, rather than being swayed by feelings or biases.

Listening Juries Are More Likely to Engage in Substantive Conflict