In a situation where police investigators want to obtain historical cell phone location data from a potential defendant's cell phone usage:
A) a potential defendant has no expectation of privacy of data that he or she has voluntarily conveyed to a third-party cell phone carrier.
B) the suspect has no expectation of privacy of cell phone records because everyone knows that such data is not considered private by society.
C) no warrant is required, and the evidence is admissible because in using a cell phone, a suspect or a defendant consents to such information generated by the phone as being available to law enforcement officials.
D) a warrant is required to obtain historical cell phone location data if the cell phone location data evidence is expected to be introduced against a suspect or defendant at a trial.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: In Mapp v. Ohio, decided in 1961,
Q46: A police officer, who possessed probable cause
Q47: If an automobile has been lawfully impounded:
A)
Q48: Wiretapping and eavesdropping:
A) have from the earliest
Q49: Law enforcement officials often wish to track
Q51: The free and voluntary rule, as it
Q52: In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court:
A)
Q53: Following the Miranda ruling, several cases that
Q54: After the Supreme Court decided the Miranda
Q55: According to the most recent interpretations of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents