Following the Miranda ruling, several cases that were necessary to interpret Miranda were decided. These decisions have pointed out that:
A) the Miranda warning must be given in the exact terms as stated in the case.
B) if a suspect has indicated that he or she does not want to give a written statement, but gives an oral statement, the oral statement is inadmissible.
C) the Miranda warnings are required if the police ask questions of a suspect who is not in custody at the time of the questioning.
D) the Miranda warning need not be given in the exact terms as stated in the Miranda case as long as the warning reasonably conveys to the suspect his or her rights as required by Miranda.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Wiretapping and eavesdropping:
A) have from the earliest
Q49: Law enforcement officials often wish to track
Q50: In a situation where police investigators want
Q51: The free and voluntary rule, as it
Q52: In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court:
A)
Q54: After the Supreme Court decided the Miranda
Q55: According to the most recent interpretations of
Q56: By a series of decisions, courts have
Q57: The right to counsel provisions of the
Q58: When a person is in police custody
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents