In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court:
A) added restrictions concerning the use of confessions by requiring that warnings be given prior to attempting to engage in custodial questioning.
B) made the delay in arraignment rule applicable to the states.
C) indicated that confessions made to law enforcement officers would no longer be admissible in evidence.
D) specifically stated that unless warnings were properly administered by the officer, evidence subsequently obtained from the subject could not be used for impeachment purposes.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: If an automobile has been lawfully impounded:
A)
Q48: Wiretapping and eavesdropping:
A) have from the earliest
Q49: Law enforcement officials often wish to track
Q50: In a situation where police investigators want
Q51: The free and voluntary rule, as it
Q53: Following the Miranda ruling, several cases that
Q54: After the Supreme Court decided the Miranda
Q55: According to the most recent interpretations of
Q56: By a series of decisions, courts have
Q57: The right to counsel provisions of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents