Several cases (United States v. Wade and Kirby v. Illinois) that relate to lineups and other confrontations have been decided. According to these cases:
A) counsel must be present at all lineups or other confrontations for identification.
B) counsel is required at the pre-indictment confrontation but not at the post-indictment confrontation.
C) if the accused has not waived counsel and counsel is not provided at the post-indictment pretrial lineup, the in-court identification could be tainted.
D) the pre-arrest, pre-indictment confrontation is a critical stage, and counsel must be present at any confrontation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q55: According to the most recent interpretations of
Q56: By a series of decisions, courts have
Q57: The right to counsel provisions of the
Q58: When a person is in police custody
Q59: The United States Supreme Court has handed
Q61: In the case of United States v.
Q62: In the United States v. Jones, where
Q63: In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, Melendez-Diaz was charged
Q64: In the case, Utah v. Strieff, the
Q65: In the case of Arizona v. Gant,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents