Testimony relating to fingerprint comparisons:
A) is not admissible unless the defendant is given the Miranda warnings.
B) is admissible for purposes of comparing prints with records on file but not for purposes of comparison with fingerprints left at the scene of a crime.
C) is not admissible because the judge cannot take judicial notice of the fact that fingerprint identification is one of the surest methods of identification.
D) is admissible in establishing the identification of the accused if the person giving the testimony qualifies as a fingerprint expert.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Several courts have considered the use of
Q23: Implied consent statutes providing for revocation of
Q24: Blood tests often serve the useful purpose
Q25: In recent years, the courts have reexamined
Q26: In jurisdictions in which the results of
Q28: Testimony relating to the results of ballistics
Q29: Speed detection devices are often used to
Q30: The courts have held that the results
Q31: In the Supreme Court case Maryland v.
Q32: Researchers have made a significant breakthrough in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents