Explain how the concepts of logical relevancy and legal relevancy relate to the traditional concept of and materiality of evidence.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Logical relevancy and legal relevancy are both important concepts in determining the admissibility of evidence in a legal proceeding.

Logical relevancy refers to whether the evidence has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. In other words, is the evidence related to the issue at hand and does it have the potential to impact the outcome of the case? This concept is closely related to the traditional concept of materiality of evidence, which considers whether the evidence is relevant to the issues in the case and whether it has the potential to affect the outcome.

Legal relevancy, on the other hand, refers to whether the evidence is admissible under the rules of evidence. This includes considerations such as whether the evidence is hearsay, whether it is more prejudicial than probative, and whether it was obtained legally. Legal relevancy is important in determining whether evidence can be presented to the court, regardless of its logical relevancy.

In relation to the traditional concept of materiality of evidence, both logical and legal relevancy play a crucial role. Materiality of evidence considers whether the evidence is relevant to the issues in the case and whether it has the potential to affect the outcome. Logical relevancy helps to determine whether the evidence is related to the issues at hand and has the potential to impact the outcome, while legal relevancy helps to determine whether the evidence is admissible under the rules of evidence.

In summary, the concepts of logical relevancy and legal relevancy are closely related to the traditional concept of materiality of evidence, as they all play a crucial role in determining the admissibility and impact of evidence in a legal proceeding.

Explain How the Concepts of Logical Relevancy and Legal Relevancy