If a state places the burden of proving insanity on a defendant, because the state may presume all persons are sane, why does this not result in a defendant having to unconstitutionally disprove an element of the crime charged?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of If a state places the burden of proving insanity on a defendant, because the state may presume all persons are sane, why does this not result in a defendant having to unconstitutionally disprove an element of the crime charged?

If a State Places the Burden of Proving Insanity on a Defendant