Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:
A) ambiguous terms.
B) why signatures are missing.
C) why a contract was not performed.
D) implied terms.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: When a contract proves to be a
Q51: Suzy Anders enters into an oral contract
Q52: A contract is interpreted to give effect
Q53: The writing required by the statute of
Q54: When a person has performed services under
Q55: A contract is created by which the
Q57: Jones and Clark entered into a written
Q58: Bart was a self-made millionaire who had
Q59: Franklin, a hobby-shop supplier, and Gordon, a
Q60: The defense of noncompliance may not be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents