Suzy Anders enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Anders feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Anders orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Anders orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Anders now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney.?Anders now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Anders honor her contractual agreements?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q46: In interpreting an ambiguous contract, one part
Q47: When interpreting an integrated contract, a court
Q48: When an insurance policy is ambiguous, the
Q49: Parol evidence may be admitted to show
Q50: When a contract proves to be a
Q52: A contract is interpreted to give effect
Q53: The writing required by the statute of
Q54: When a person has performed services under
Q55: A contract is created by which the
Q56: Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents