In which key case is it said that the distinction between influence and undue influence is determined by considering a transaction, 'failing proof to the contrary, is explicable only on the basis that it has been procured by undue influence'?
A) National Westminster Bank v Morgan
B) Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge
C) Attorney-General v R
D) BCCI v Aboody
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: It is appropriate to presume undue influence
Q21: In Allcard v Skinner a relationship
Q22: Presumed undue influence may be argued to
Q23: Unless influence is presumed, it would take
Q24: The requirement of 'manifest disadvantage' is not
Q26: In Lloyd's Bank v Bundy a
Q27: In National Westminster Bank plc v
Q28: A guarantee given by one spouse for
Q29: In which of the following cases was
Q30: What are the remedies typically used in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents