A guarantee given by one spouse for the debts of another is not usually thought to be one 'manifest disadvantage' for what reason?
A) A guarantee by a spouse if considered to be a manifestly disadvantageous
B) Because couple tend to be in business together - a guarantee would be for the benefit of the business
C) Because guarantees are seldom called upon so in reality it would not affect the guarantor
D) Because it would normally allow the guarantor to stay in the matrimonial home, which would be an advantage
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Unless influence is presumed, it would take
Q24: The requirement of 'manifest disadvantage' is not
Q25: In which key case is it said
Q26: In Lloyd's Bank v Bundy a
Q27: In National Westminster Bank plc v
Q29: In which of the following cases was
Q30: What are the remedies typically used in
Q31: Which of the following is not a
Q32: What is meant by 'actual' undue influence?
A)
Q33: Which of the following relationships is not
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents