In which case did Lord Scarman identify certain factors as being relevant to whether a person acted voluntarily or under duress?
A) Dimskal Shipping co SA v International #Transport Workers' Federation, The Evia Luck (1992)
B) CTN Cash and Carry v Gallaher (1994)
C) Pao On v Lau Yiu Long (1980)
D) Atlas Express v Kafco (1989)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: Arnold threatens to harm Sarah's children unless
Q18: Which of the following is not a
Q19: Which case introduced the notion of 'economic
Q20: Which case discusses the notion of 'lawful
Q21: What is the meaning of 'illegitimate threat'?
A)
Q22: The absence of duress was important in
Q23: A party that enters into a contract
Q24: Which of the following factors is not
Q25: The remedies available for duress are?
A) Damages
B)
Q26: Occidental Worldwide Investment Corp v Skibs A/S
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents