According to Carruthers, animals lack moral standing, and therefore we have no direct moral duties toward them. Nonetheless, Carruthers claims that we have indirect moral duties to animals. What does Carruthers mean by this and how does he argue for it? Is his argument convincing? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q91: Which of the following is sufficient for
Q92: Why, according to Carruthers, would rational contractors
Q93: Why, according to Carruthers, does our attachment
Q94: Torturing an animal or causing it unnecessary
Q95: What do our duties toward animals derive
Q96: According to Carruthers, the common-sense intuition that
Q97: What is contractualism? Is this the best
Q98: Carruthers claims that the social-stability argument cannot
Q100: Case Study
Zoos have been criticized as morally
Q101: Case Study
Zoos have been criticized as morally
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents