What was the significance of the libel cases of Goldwater v. Ginzburg, Harte- Hanks Communications v. Connaughton, and Turner v. KTRK?
A) they established that because of the "actual malice" rule, political candidates and other public figures have zero chance of winning libel suits
B) they established that no one is "libel proof," and that it is possible for political candidates and other public figures to meet the "actual malice" standard and win libel suits if their cases are strong enough
C) they led to rulings that being charged with a serious crime is enough to make a person a public figure, even if he or she was not a public figure beforehand
D) they led to rulings that just being charged with a serious crime does not make a person a "public figure" if he or she was not a public figure beforehand
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: A federal law specifies that Internet service
Q6: Although not recognized by all courts, the
Q7: Which of the following is true concerning
Q8: The reluctance of journalists to pursue aggressive
Q9: Even though the case of MMAR Group
Q11: In 1930, a New York state court
Q12: Texas Cattleman's Association v. Winfrey was an
Q13: According to common law principles, which of
Q14: In the libel cases of New York
Q15: The case of Milkovich v. Lorain Journal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents