In the privacy/false light suit of Time Inc. v. Hill, the Hill family was unable to win its case (in its final resolution) because of which of the following?
A) the Hill family had criminal records and therefore had no privacy rights
B) the court applied the "actual malice rule" because the Hill family, through not public figures per se, was involved in a matter of public interest
C) Time Inc. was able to prove its story published in Life, which it owned, was truthful and accurate
D) Time Inc. was able to prove the Hill family was not identified in the Life story

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court applied the "actual malice rule" because the Hill family, through not public figures per se, was involved in a matter of public interest. This means that the Hill family had to prove that Time Inc. acted with actual malice, or a reckless disregard for the truth, in publishing the article. Since they were unable to prove this, they lost the case. None of the other choices are accurate or relevant to the case.

In the Privacy/false Light Suit of Time Inc