In 2016, What Did a Federal Court Rule in the Defamation

In 2016, what did a federal court rule in the defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone magazine for its story that featured allegations of rape at UVA?

A) It ruled in favor of Rolling Stone.
B) It ruled against Rolling Stone and dictated that the magazine retract this article.
C) It found the reporter who wrote the story liable, but not Rolling Stone itself.
D) It found the reporter who wrote the story, Rolling Stone, and its parent company, Wenner Media, all liable.