Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Philosophy
Study Set
Introduction to Formal Logic with Philosophical Applications
Quiz 4: Monadic Predicate Logic
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 301
Essay
determine whether the given argument is valid or invalid. If it is valid, provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises. If it is invalid, provide a counterexample. -1. (∃x)[Ax • (Bx
∨
\lor
∨
Cx)] 2. (∀x)(Bx ⊃ ∼Cx) 3. (∃x)Bx 4. Ca / (∃x)(Ax • Cx)
Question 302
Essay
determine whether the given formula is a logical truth of M or not. If it is a logical truth, provide a proof of the formula. If it is not a logical truth, provide a counterexample in a finite domain. -(∀x)(Ax ⊃ ∼Bx)
∨
\lor
∨
(∃x)(Ax • Bx)
Question 303
Essay
determine whether the given formula is a logical truth of M or not. If it is a logical truth, provide a proof of the formula. If it is not a logical truth, provide a counterexample in a finite domain. -(∃x)(Cx • Dx)
∨
\lor
∨
(∃x)(Cx • ∼Dx)
Question 304
Essay
determine whether the given formula is a logical truth of M or not. If it is a logical truth, provide a proof of the formula. If it is not a logical truth, provide a counterexample in a finite domain. -[(∃x)Ex • (∃x)∼Ex] ⊃ (∀x)(Ex
∨
\lor
∨
∼Ex)
Question 305
Essay
determine whether the given formula is a logical truth of M or not. If it is a logical truth, provide a proof of the formula. If it is not a logical truth, provide a counterexample in a finite domain. -[(∀x)(Fx ⊃ Gx) • (∀x)(Gx ⊃ Hx)] ⊃ (∃x)(Fx • Hx)