Why did the claim for pure economic loss fail in Customs & Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank [2006]?
A) The claimant could not show that a special (fiduciary) relationship existed on which to base a duty of care.
B) The claimant could not show that they had relied on the defendant.
C) The claimant could not show that their reliance had been reasonable in the circumstances.
D) Because the defendant had not assumed responsibility.
E) Because the assumption of responsibility by the defendant was not voluntary
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following have been used
Q6: In Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v
Q7: Match the time periods below with the
Q8: Match the time periods below with the
Q9: Match the time periods below with the
Q10: Match the time periods below with the
Q11: In Anns v Merton London Borough Council
Q12: In Murphy v Brentwood DC [1990], cracks
Q13: Since Murphy v Brentwood DC [1990], in
Q15: Describing the position of the claimants in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents