Describing the position of the claimants in White v Jones [1995] as evidencing 'a lacuna in the law that ought to be filled' (at 260), Lord Goff then went on to explain the reason behind his decision that a duty of care existed:
'The _______ of denying such a remedy is reinforced if one considers the importance of legacies in a society which recognises . . . the right of citizens to leave their assets to whom they please, and in which, as a result, legacies can be of great importance to individual citizens, providing very often the only opportunity for a citizen to acquire a significant capital sum; or to inherit a house, so providing a secure roof over the heads of himself and his family; or to make special provision for his or her old age'.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Describing the position of the claimants in White v Jones [1995] as evidencing 'a lacuna in the law that ought to be filled' (at 260), Lord Goff then went on to explain the reason behind his decision that a duty of care existed:
'The _______ of denying such a remedy is reinforced if one considers the importance of legacies in a society which recognises . . . the right of citizens to leave their assets to whom they please, and in which, as a result, legacies can be of great importance to individual citizens, providing very often the only opportunity for a citizen to acquire a significant capital sum; or to inherit a house, so providing a secure roof over the heads of himself and his family; or to make special provision for his or her old age'.

Describing the Position of the Claimants in White V Jones