What is the best explanation of why no duty of care was found in Smith v Littlewoods Organisation [1987]?
A) The House of Lords would not find a duty of care as the actions of the third parties were unforeseeable to the defendant.
B) The third party's actions broke the chain of causation.
C) The defendant had omitted to do anything about the third party, but there is no general duty in respect of omissions.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In which of the circumstances outlined below
Q2: What reasons have been given to justify
Q3: Parents always owe a duty of care
Q4: Complete this quote, taken from Beldam LJ's
Q5: It is problematic to find that a
Q6: The law on whether there is, or
Q7: In Smith v Littlewoods Ltd [1987]), Lord
Q9: Why did the claimants lose in Palmer
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents