According to Norcross, any attempt to justify the claim that humans have a higher moral status than other animals by appealing to some version of rationality as the morally relevant difference between humans and animals will
A) fail to give an adequate answer to the argument from marginal cases.
B) fail to make the case that such a difference is morally relevant to the status of animals as moral patients as opposed to their status as moral agents.
C) both A and B
D) neither A nor B
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: In Carruther's view, the justification for moral
Q23: According to Carruthers, whenever someone is required
Q24: Which of the following potentially morally relevant
Q25: For the purposes of Norcross's discussion, to
Q26: According to Norcross, which of the following
Q28: According to some defenders of meat-eating, the
Q29: Norcross claims that if morality demands that
Q30: Norcross agrees that if a being is
Q31: Necessarily, if it is wrong to be
Q32: Because animals cannot be virtuous, a virtue
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents