According to some defenders of meat-eating, the suffering of animals counts less than the suffering of humans (if at all) because

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Some defenders of meat-eating argue that humans are rational and animals are not, and therefore the suffering of animals counts less than the suffering of humans (if at all). This view is based on the belief that rationality gives humans a special moral status that outweighs the interests and welfare of animals. However, this argument has been challenged by many animal rights advocates who argue that the capacity for suffering and enjoyment is the basis for moral consideration, and that animals are capable of experiencing pain and pleasure just as humans are.

According to Some Defenders of Meat-Eating, the Suffering of Animals