Which case established that the practice of "stop and frisk" based on reasonable suspicion was valid?
A) Terry v. Ohio
B) Mapp v. Ohio
C) United States v. Leon
D) Carroll v. United States
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Officers may frisk a suspect for weapons
Q2: The purpose of a frisk is:
A) Officer
Q4: Which case established that reasonable suspicion based
Q5: Which of the following should not be
Q6: In _, the Supreme Court ruled that
Q7: The extent of a frisk is limited
Q8: What starts as a frisk may quickly
Q9: What is the proper standard for evaluating
Q10: Police officers may order passengers out of
Q11: The _ Amendment allows police officers, pursuant
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents