In ________, the Supreme Court ruled that presence in a high-crime area, combined with unprovoked flight upon observing police officers, gives officers sufficient grounds to investigate further to determine if criminal activity is about to take place.
A) Adams v. Williams
B) Illinois v. Wardlow
C) Minnesota v. Dickerson
D) Terry v. Ohio

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Illinois v. Wardlow established that an individual's presence in a high-crime area, combined with unprovoked flight upon seeing police, provides enough reason for police to conduct a stop and investigate for possible criminal activity.

In ________, the Supreme Court Ruled That Presence in a High-Crime