Probably the most common form of judicial restraint is the self-restraint of the judges themselves, who follow well-established professional norms of objectivity.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Judicial restraint often involves judges exercising self-restraint by adhering to established legal precedents and norms of objectivity, rather than injecting personal opinions or making decisions based on potential outcomes. This approach emphasizes the importance of stability and predictability in the law.

Probably the Most Common Form of Judicial Restraint Is the Self-Restraint